Grease Wars 3: Supercool Goo
  Introduction
  Let the war 
    begin. The largest thermal grease war at TargetPC that is! Today, we compare 
    new versions to old versions and improved versions. This five greaser shootout 
    has a surprise winner with a surprise price. It's Nanotherm versus Arctic 
    Silver in a review that took three weeks of dedicated testing. I just hope 
    that the heatsink clip on my aging P3 holds out...
   
     
      
         
          | Factory 
              Specifications | Nanotherm 
              Ice & Blue | 
         
          | 
              Available 
                in two flavors: Ice & BlueNegligible 
                Electrical ConductivityThick, Viscous, 
                Sticky ConsistencyDoes not 
                Separate, Leech or Dry OutPrice: $4.95 
                USD for 2g/1.5cc |  | 
         
          | Factory 
              Specifications | Arctic 
              Silver 3 | 
         
          |  
              
                Made with 
                  99.9% pure micronized silverDoes not 
                  contain any siliconeControlled 
                  triple phase viscosityPrice: 
                  $7.95 USD for 3g/1cc |  | 
      
     
   
  The Products 
    (from the Nanotherm 
    review)
  I remember 
    an old TV ad that opened with senior citizens driving down a crowed street. 
    A woman asked the male driver about changing the car's oil and his reply was, 
    "motor oil is motor oil."
  When setting 
    up your new P4 or T'bird screamer, I'm sure most consider very carefully every 
    single part that goes into the case. Except for some odd reason, the thermal 
    grease gets left out. Some argue the benefits when grease is substituted for 
    an inefficient pad, but is there is difference between greases themselves? 
    Can one be significantly better than another? If you recall my aging Arctic 
    Silver review, you'll see that quality of thermal paste varies greatly. 
    
  What I've 
    discovered with heatsink compound is that generally speaking, you want a thick 
    viscous compound. This is good for several reasons. First, a viscous grease 
    is less prone to drying out over time (months, years). Second, tiny air pockets 
    are less likely to decrease the tight coupling between heatsink and CPU. 
  Arctic Alumina 
    is similar to Nanotherm Ice and Blue in that they both veer away from using 
    small micronized metallic particles. These Metallic particles aren't necessarily 
    bad; however, with all electrically conductive particles, some risk of damage 
    may occur either over time or under extreme pressure. No need to worry with 
    either Ice, Blue or Alumina.
  Arctic Silver 
    3 is the new and improved version of the high end grease that started it all, 
    Arctic Silver. AS3 is slightly electrically capacitive and while a solid contact 
    area should be maintained, extreme pressure could cause it to become conductive.
  Nanotherm's 
    contestants are the same as in Grease 
    Wars 2, with the exception of Blue. It is new and improved even though 
    I didn't specifically test the old and new revisions for this test.
  Testing 
    Notes
  Arctic Silver 
    and Nanotherm products do require several days of CPU cycling in order to 
    achieve maximum stability. Since this effect is particularly prevalent with 
    Ice, Blue and AS3, I chose to concentrate on these samples with multiple tests 
    performed over several days for each. As you will discover on the next page, 
    AS3 appears to do worse over time, rather than better. The Nanotherm products 
    are so stable that prolonged testing produced insignificantly different numbers.
  This will 
    be the last series of tests using my old Pentium 3 rig. The previous tests 
    performed in my older reviews are not comparable due to many system changes 
    such as moving from a GF2 to a GF3 Ti-500 and different overclocking parameters. 
    All further tests will be using a P4 1.6GHz overclocked to 2.0Ghz or higher.
  